Variations and inequities in access to cardiac diagnostic services in Ontario Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Echocardiography is an essential diagnostic modality known to have wide regional utilization variations. This study's objectives were to quantify regional variations and to examine the extent to which they are explained by differences in population age, sex, cardiac disease prevalence (CDP), and social determinants of health (SDH) risk. METHODS: This is an observational study of all echocardiography exams performed in Ontario in 2019/20 (n = 695,622). We measured regional variations in echocardiography crude rates and progressively standardized rates for population age, sex, CDP, and SDH risk. RESULTS: After controlling for differences in population age, sex, and CDP, Ontario's highest rate regions had echocardiography rates 57% higher than its lowest rate regions. Forty eight percent of total variation was not explained by differences in age, sex, and CDP. CDP increased with SDH risk. Access to most cardiac diagnostics was negatively correlated with SDH risk, while cardiac catheterization rates were positively correlated with SDH risk. CONCLUSION: Variations analysis that adjusts for age and sex only without including clinical measures of need are likely to overestimate the unwarranted portion of total variation. Substantial variations persisted despite a mandatory provider accreditation policy aimed at curtailing them. The associations between variations and SDH risks imply a need to redress access and outcome inequities.

Impact of a Mandated Accreditation Process on 1,045 Registered Echocardiographic Service Providers in a Previously Unregulated, Publicly Funded Environment.

BACKGROUND: This review was undertaken to examine the impact of a standards-based, mandated accreditation process on several aspects of echocardiographic service delivery in a single-payer, previously unregulated environment. METHODS: In the province of Ontario, virtually all echocardiographic services are funded by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. The Echocardiography Quality Improvement (EQI) process was introduced in 2012 and subsequently linked formally to reimbursement in 2016. Previously, payment for echocardiographic services in Ontario was unregulated. The impact of EQI on the number of facilities, echocardiographic volumes, costs, quality standards, and physician service provision were compared before and after implementation. RESULTS: Of the initial 1,045 registrants, 604 (57.8%) have been accredited or accreditation is expected having successfully resolved identified deficiencies. The remaining registrants were either never functionally operating (323 [30.9%]) or have withdrawn services (118 [11.3%]) since mandatory registration became a requirement for reimbursement. A number of factors identified facilities that were able to most promptly meet EQI standards, including hospital-based, academic, and multiple-physician facilities. The average annual increase in the utilization of echocardiographic services before EQI was 6.7%, decreasing to 2.7% since. The proportion of repeat examinations decreased in community-based facilities. Since 2013, costs for echocardiographic services have totaled about $92.3 million less than predicted by pre-2012 trends. To address standards, some small, more isolated facilities sought out alliances with larger facilities, particularly those affiliated with academic hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: EQI is demonstrably a means for improving quality while reducing the rate of growth and repeat examinations.